Thanks, you answered so fast that I know I am stepping into dangerous grounds.
But I would like to know more about your experience. Any links that you can give me to read about the code and/or issues regarding the ip4r experience? Vicky ________________________________ De: Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk> Enviado: lunes, 3 de abril de 2017 11:28 p. m. Para: Vicky Vergara Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org Asunto: Re: [HACKERS] Instead of DROP function use UPDATE pg_proc in an upgrade extension script >>>>> "Vicky" == Vicky Vergara <vicky_verg...@hotmail.com> writes: Vicky> UPDATE pg_proc SET [...] Vicky> So, I want to know how "safe" can you consider the second Vicky> method, and what kind of other objects do I need to test besides Vicky> views. Speaking from personal experience (I did this in the upgrade script for ip4r, in a much simpler case than yours, and broke it badly), it's not at all safe. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)