On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > I propose we move this patch to the next CF.
I agree. I think it's too late to be working out fine details around TOAST like this. This is a patch that touches the storage format in a fairly fundamental way. The idea of turning WARM on or off reminds me a little bit of the way it was at one time suggested that HOT not be used against catalog tables, a position that Tom pushed against. I'm not saying that it's necessarily a bad idea, but we should exhaust alternatives, and have a clear rationale for it. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
