Hi, On 2017-03-16 12:21:31 -0400, David Steele wrote: > Any reviewers want to have a look?
Unfortunately there wasn't much of that. I think that this patch atm doesn't have sufficient design agreement to be considered for v10. As the current CF has formally ended, I think we'll have to punt this to v11. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers