On 04/06/2017 08:33 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:10:59AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote:
On 03/07/2017 08:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
here is a separate thread dedicated to the following extension for
CREATE/ALTER ROLE: PASSWORD ('value' USING 'method').
The parentheses seem weird ... do we really need those?
Seeing 3 opinions in favor of that, let's do so then. I have updated
the patch to not use parenthesis.
The regression tests only exercise the CREATE ROLE...USING version, not the
ALTER ROLE...USING version.
+ and <literal>plain</> for an non-hashed password. If the password
+ string is already in MD5-hashed or SCRAM-hashed, then it is
+ stored hashed as-is.
In the last line, I think "stored as-is" sounds better.
Other than that, it looks good to me.
Thanks for the review. Attached is an updated patch.
[Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.
This isn't critical, SCRAM is fully functional without this new syntax.
I think we should drop this, and revisit for Postgres 11, if it feels
like we still want this then. I'll remove this from the open items list.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: