On 2/15/17 11:19, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > So I would like to have a background worker limit per user, as you > allude to. Attached is a patch that implements a GUC setting > max_worker_processes_per_user. > > Besides the uses for background sessions, but it can also be useful for > parallel workers, logical replication apply workers, or things like > third-party partitioning extensions.
Given that background sessions have been postponed, is there still interest in this separate from that? It would be useful for per-user parallel worker limits, for example. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
