On 4/4/17 2:47 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> At the very least, you should change comments to note the issue. I
> think it's highly unlikely that this could ever result in a failure to
> find a split point, which there are many defenses against already, but
> I think I would find that difficult to prove. The intent of the code
> is almost as important as the code, at least in my opinion.

This submission as been Returned with Feedback.  Please feel free to
resubmit to a future commitfest.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to