On 2017-04-08 23:01:06 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote: > > Hmm. It looks like none of the buildfarm members are running the > > authentication tests. Nor recovery tests, nor subscription tests. We're > > missing a trick here, at least some of the buildfarm members really ought to > > run "make check-world", we're missing a lot of coverage otherwise. > > I recall that Andrew has been favoring as much as possible one folder > path per test series in the buildfarm client (perhaps to keep the > tests separated and have the logs easier to analyze?). I would not > mind much if this is replaced by a pure make check-world, which is > what most of the serious hackers do, or at least a make check running > from src/test to save us a lot of maintenance pain.
I think it's partially knowing which target failed, and which regression.diffs to display. If we were able to revamp check-world so it outputs a list of targets the regression machinery were able to run individually, it'd probably help? - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
