On 2014-09-24 16:26:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > > On 9/24/14 9:21 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Agreed, but what about non-GCC compilers? > > > Stick AC_PROG_CC_C99 into configure.in. > > I think that's a bad idea, unless you mean to do it only on Solaris. > If we do that unconditionally, we will pretty much stop getting any > warnings about C99-isms on modern platforms.
FWIW, that's not that much of an issue these days, because e.g. mylodon runs with -std=c89 -Werror=c99-extensions - so far that seems to have been reasonably accurate. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers