On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Petr Jelinek
>>> <petr.jeli...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>> On 10/04/17 07:16, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Attached a patch for $subject.
>>>>>
>>>>> I added this parameter into "Asynchronous Behavior" section of
>>>>> "RESOURCE" section. But GUC parameter for subscriber now is written in
>>>>> this section, in spite of there is "REPLICATION" section. I think that
>>>>> we can coordinate these parameters to not confuse user. For example in
>>>>> documentation, these parameters are described in "19.6.4. Subscribers"
>>>>> section of "19.6. Replication" section. Thought?
>>
>> Yes, I think that we should not only add the parameter into
>> postgresql.conf.sample
>> but also
>>
>> - add REPLICATION_SUBSCRIBERS into config_group
>> - mark max_logical_replication_workers and max_sync_workers_per_subscription
>>   as REPLICATION_SUBSCRIBERS parameters, in guc.c
>> - move those parameters into "Subscribers" section in postgresql.conf.sample
>
> +1
>
>> The attached patch does these.
>
> The patch looks good to me.

Pushed. Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to