On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:14:23PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > > Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> writes: > >>>>> Are these votes for getting rid of both win32.mak and bcc32.mak? > > > >> PFA a patch that does this. Did I miss something? :) > > > > Perhaps we should get rid of the WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER symbol altogether; > > given this patch, "#ifdef WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER" could be replaced by > > "#ifdef _MSC_VER". > > That's here in the patch for people wondering: > -#if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__) > +#if defined(_MSC_VER) > #define WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER > #endif > +1 for the renaming. > > > Ok, since we have two votes for it, I will go ahead and do that (as a separate > patch pushed together).'
I am fine with removing things, but I do remember one reason the Borland part was kept is that some tool would only work with the Borland-compiled library, not gcc or MSVC, but that was long ago. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
