On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:32:32PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I was looking at this some more and now think there is something wrong
> with the references to ss_family rather than a missing inlcude file.
> Perhaps those were supposed to be references to sa_family or there
> is a missing field from the socket_storage type definition.

The struct sockaddr_storage should only have 1 field you can use
and that is ss_family.  The other fields are there just to get
the right size and padding.

Does your system have it's own (broken?) struct sockaddr_storage


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to