On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:32:32PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > I was looking at this some more and now think there is something wrong > with the references to ss_family rather than a missing inlcude file. > Perhaps those were supposed to be references to sa_family or there > is a missing field from the socket_storage type definition.
The struct sockaddr_storage should only have 1 field you can use and that is ss_family. The other fields are there just to get the right size and padding. Does your system have it's own (broken?) struct sockaddr_storage maybe? Kurt ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
