On 13/04/17 07:02, Andres Freund wrote: > > On April 12, 2017 9:58:12 PM PDT, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:21:51AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: >>> On 2017-04-12 11:03:57 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>>> On 4/12/17 02:31, Noah Misch wrote: >>>>>>> But I hope you mean to commit these snapbuild patches before >> the postgres 10 >>>>>>> release? As far as I know, logical replication is still very >> broken without >>>>>>> them (or at least some of that set of 5 patches - I don't know >> which ones >>>>>>> are essential and which may not be). >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, these should go into 10 *and* earlier releases, and I don't >> plan to >>>>>> wait for 2017-07. >>>>> >>>>> [Action required within three days. This is a generic >> notification.] >>>> >>>> I'm hoping for a word from Andres on this. >>> >>> Feel free to reassign to me. >> >> Thanks for volunteering; I'll do that shortly. Please observe the >> policy on >> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar >> days of >> this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. >> >> [1] >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com > > Will, volunteering might be the wrong word. These ate all my fault, although > none look v10 specific. >
Yeah none of this is v10 specific, the importance to v10 is that it affects the logical replication in core, not just extensions like in 9.4-9.6. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers