Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2017-04-15 17:24:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I wonder whether we could work around that by just destroying the created >> process and trying again if we get a collision. It'd be a tad >> inefficient, but hopefully collisions wouldn't happen often enough to be a >> big problem.
> That might work, although it's obviously not pretty. We could also just > default to some out-of-the-way address for MapViewOfFileEx, that might > also work. Could be. Does Microsoft publish any documentation about the range of addresses their ASLR uses? Obviously, any such fix would be a lot more likely to be reliable in 64-bit machines. There's probably not enough daylight to be sure of making it work in 32-bit Windows, so I suspect we'd need some retry logic anyway for that case. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers