On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:33:22AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > While testing table sync worker for logical replication I noticed that > if the table sync worker of logical replication failed to insert the > data for whatever reason, the table sync worker process exits with > error. And then the main apply worker launches the table sync worker > again soon without interval. This routine is executed at very high > frequency without interval. > > Should we do put a interval (wal_retrieve_interval or make a new GUC > parameter?) for launching the table sync worker?
[Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.] The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Peter, since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on open item ownership and send a status update within three calendar days of this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts toward speedy resolution. Thanks.  https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers