Andreas Karlsson <> writes:
> On 04/16/2017 03:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> 1. Back-patch that patch, probably also including the followup adjustments
>> in 86029b31e and 36a3be654.

> Given that I cannot recall seeing any complaints about the behavior of 
> 9.4 compared to 9.3 I am leaning towards #1. That way there are fewer 
> different versions of our OpenSSL code.

Yeah, I was thinking about that point too.  Barring objections I'll
do #1 and then move forward with the openssl 1.1 backport.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to