Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I think showing bgw_name as backend_type always sounds reasonable. No
> need to treat external implementations differently.
That's definitely an approach we could use. It would encourage people
to use short bgw_names, which is a constraint that wasn't especially
apparent before, but I don't think that's a bad thing.
regards, tom lane
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: