Peter Eisentraut <> writes:
> I think showing bgw_name as backend_type always sounds reasonable.  No
> need to treat external implementations differently.

That's definitely an approach we could use.  It would encourage people
to use short bgw_names, which is a constraint that wasn't especially
apparent before, but I don't think that's a bad thing.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to