Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I'm wondering what the design rationale was for only starting one
>> bgworker per invocation.
> The rationale was that there may be other tasks waiting for postmaster
> attention, and if there are many bgworkers needing to be started, the
> other work may be delayed for a long time. This is not the first time
> that this rationale has been challenged, but so far there hasn't been
> any good reason to change it. One option is to just remove it as you
> propose, but a different one is to stop using select(2) in ServerLoop,
> because those behavior differences seem to make it rather unusable.
Hm. Do you have a more-portable alternative?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
