* Heikki Linnakangas (hlinn...@iki.fi) wrote:
> I think we should adopt that exact format, so that our verifiers are
> compatible with RFC 5803. It doesn't make any immediate difference,
> but since there is a standard out there, might as well follow it.


> And just in case we get support for looking up SCRAM verifiers from
> an LDAP server in the future, it will come handy as we won't need to
> parse two different formats.




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to