On 4/20/17 22:57, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Petr Jelinek
> <petr.jeli...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 20/04/17 23:30, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On 4/20/17 10:19, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>>> Hmm well since this only affects the synchronization of table
>>>> states/names, I guess we could just simply do that before we create the
>>>> slot as there is no expectancy of consistency between slot and the table
>>>> list snapshot.
>>> I suppose that wouldn't hurt.
>>> Prior to the table sync patch, a missing target relation would just show
>>> up as an error later on in the logs.  So having the error sooner
>>> actually seems like a good change.
>> Very simple patch to make.
> +1 for that.

Committed that.

I don't think there is anything else open here.

Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to