Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 4/21/17 14:49, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> I'll add a comment, but doing it in PostgresNode.pm would mean jacana >> (for instance) couldn't run any of the TAP tests. I'mm looking at >> installing a sufficiently modern Test::Simple package (includes >> Test::More and test::Build) there, but other oldish machines could also >> be affected.
> Or you could define note() as an empty function if it doesn't exist. +1. I'm really not at all happy with the prospect that every time somebody adds a use of "note" to some new TAP test, we're going to get a complaint later that that test no longer works on jacana. We need to either decide that non-ancient Test::More is a hard requirement for all the tests, or fix things with a centralized solution. A dummy (or not so dummy?) implementation would serve for the latter. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers