On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 21:22, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > There is no alternative, unless you want the command to be > > non-roll-back-able. > > Well, you can do a cluster-type table duplication...
Thats still double the disk space, although that has the nice side effect of not requiring a vacuum. -- Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part