It seems that in 'load_relcache_init_file()', we forget to initialize
'rd_pdcxt' of relcache.
2017-04-27 0:33 GMT+08:00 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Amit Langote
> >> <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> >>> Your patch seems to be a much better solution to the problem, thanks.
> >> Does anyone wish to object to this patch as untimely?
> >> If not, I'll commit it.
> > It's certainly not untimely to address such problems. What I'm wondering
> > is if we should commit both patches. Avoiding an unnecessary heap_open
> > is certainly a good thing, but it seems like the memory leak addressed
> > by the first patch might still be of concern in other scenarios.
> I will defer to you on that. If you think that patch is a good idea,
> please have at it.
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company