Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2017-05-01 12:32:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> But quite aside from the question of whether we can afford the cycles, >> it seems like the wrong approach. IMO the buildfarm is mainly for >> verifying portability, not for trying to prove that race-like >> conditions don't exist. In most situations we're going out of our way >> to ensure reproduceability of tests we add to the buildfarm sequence; >> but it seems like this is looking for irreproducible results.
> Yea, I wondered about that upthread as well. But the tests are quite > useful nonetheless. Wonder about adding them simply as a separate > target. I have no objection to adding more tests as a non-default target. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers