I've relaxed the regexps there. It's still not exactly what the PG parser accepts, but I think it's a superset now, so we should be safe.
Will it be released with the next pg10dev compilation?
The answer is "yes", and it works as expected. Vielen Dank again for the fix! -- Fabien. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers