I wrote: > Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 5/12/17 4:46 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Although I've not done anything about it here, I'm not happy about the >>> handling of dependencies for stats objects.
>> Yeah, it's a bit frankensteinian ... > I'm prepared to create a fix for that, but it'd be easier to commit the > current patch first, to avoid merge conflicts. Done. I noted that we weren't making an owner dependency either :-(. Also, we might want to think about letting stats objects be extension members sometime. As things stand, if an extension script does CREATE STATISTICS, the stats object will just be "loose" rather than bound into the extension. We still have docs and nomenclature issues to work on. Anyone want to take point on those? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers