On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com>
>>> ... I'd like to propose to change relation
>>> extension lock management so that it works using LWLock instead.
>> That's not a good idea because it'll make the code that executes while
>> holding that lock noninterruptible.
> Is that really a problem? We typically only hold it over one kernel call,
> which ought to be noninterruptible anyway.
During parallel bulk load operations, I think we hold it over multiple
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: