On 13 May 2017 at 22:22, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Apparently you are not testing against current HEAD. That's been there > since d10c626de (a whole two days now ;-))
Indeed, I was working on a more than two-day old antiquity. Unfortunately, it's even more complicated to apply this patch against the current HEAD, so I'll wait for a rebased version.
