On 13 May 2017 at 22:22, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Apparently you are not testing against current HEAD.  That's been there
> since d10c626de (a whole two days now ;-))

Indeed, I was working on a more than two-day old antiquity. Unfortunately,
it's even more complicated
to apply this patch against the current HEAD, so I'll wait for a rebased

Reply via email to