Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> We could maybe make 001_ssltests.pl save and restore the file's
>> permissions, but I think probably a cleaner answer is to have it
>> make a temporary copy and set the permissions on that.

> Ah, you are talking about ss/client.key here... Using a temporary copy
> makes the most sense to me, as there is no need to think about putting
> back the old permissions on test failure, and the original tree
> remains unmodified all the time.

Pushed with minor adjustments --- I made the test script unlink the temp
file at the end, and tightened the .gitignore patterns a bit.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to