Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> We could maybe make 001_ssltests.pl save and restore the file's >> permissions, but I think probably a cleaner answer is to have it >> make a temporary copy and set the permissions on that.
> Ah, you are talking about ss/client.key here... Using a temporary copy > makes the most sense to me, as there is no need to think about putting > back the old permissions on test failure, and the original tree > remains unmodified all the time. Pushed with minor adjustments --- I made the test script unlink the temp file at the end, and tightened the .gitignore patterns a bit. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers