Hi, At Mon, 15 May 2017 14:35:20 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote in <cab7npqtfsnw3920koy62ngj761we3btee1omqnrbkndr1ml...@mail.gmail.com> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > If we can accept multiple server versions share a tablespace > > directory, pg_basebackup also can allow that situation. The > > attached patch does that. Similary to the server code, it > > correctly fails if the same version subdirectory exists. > > +#define verify_dir_is_empty_or_create(dirname, created, found) \ > + verify_and_create_dir(dirname, created, found, false) > This solution looks like a quick-and-dirty fix. I tend to prefer a
You're right, it just intends to reduce the amount of modification to clarify what the patch does is. It is to be replced with the bare functions. > solution close to whet Pierre is proposing on the other thread by > localizing things in ReceiveAndUnpackTarFile(). This makes the check > more localized, and there is no need to complicate low-level APIs of > pg_basebackup.c. > > By the way, it may be better to keep discussions on the first thread created: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/05c62730-8670-4da6-b783-52e66fb42...@pinaraf.info > A patch has been submitted to the next CF there as well. I noticed it after the mail upthread. I have sent a comment on that and moved to the thread. Thanks for noticing. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers