On Tue, 16 May 2017 21:36:11 +0900 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2017/05/16 21:11, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Ildus Kurbangaliev > > <i.kurbangal...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > >> I agree. Maybe this issue should be added to Postgresql Open Items? > >> I think there should be some complex solution that fixes not only > >> triggers for foreign tables at table partitioning, but covers other > >> possible not working cases. > > > I doubt if this is an open item, since DMLs on foreign tables are > > supported since 9.3 and support to add foreign tables to inheritance > > was added back in 9.5. > > I think this issue was introduced by the latter, so that was my fault. > > One approach I came up with to fix this issue is to rewrite the > targetList entries of an inherited UPDATE/DELETE properly using > rewriteTargetListUD, when generating a plan for each child table in > inheritance_planner. Attached is a WIP patch for that. Maybe I am > missing something, though. > > Best regards, > Etsuro Fujita I tested the patch, looks good. -- --- Ildus Kurbangaliev Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com Russian Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
