On 5/16/17 11:10, Jeff Davis wrote: > I concur at this point. I originally thought hash functions might be > made portable, but I think Tom and Andres showed that to be too > problematic -- the issue with different encodings is the real killer.
I think it would be OK that if you want to move a hash-partitioned table to a database with a different encoding, you have to do dump/restore through the parent table. This is quite similar to what you have to do now if you want to move a range-partitioned table to a database with a different locale. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
