On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Also, looking at the patch, it doesn't look like it take enough care
> to build execution state of new worker so that it can participate in a
> running query. I may be wrong, but the execution state initialization
> routines are written with the assumption that all the workers start
> simultaneously?
>

No such assumptions, workers started later can also join the execution
of the query.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to