On 2017/05/19 1:09, Dilip Kumar wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:07 PM, amul sul <sula...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I would suggest "non-zero positive", since that's what we are using in >>> the documentation. >>> >> >> Understood, Fixed in the attached version. > > Why non-zero positive? We do support zero for the remainder right?
Using "non-negative integers" (for remainders) was suggested upthread. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
