Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Janes <> writes:
> > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Tom Lane <> wrote:

> > If we invent more types in the future, would we expect those to be
> > defaulted to as well?
> I might be wrong, but my impression is that the plan is to default
> to gathering all possible stats types.  So I'd probably write the
> addendum that way rather than naming those two types specifically.

Yes -- that plan has been hardcoded in ruleutils.c.

I'll patch.

Álvaro Herrera      
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to