Tom Lane wrote: > Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > If we invent more types in the future, would we expect those to be > > defaulted to as well? > > I might be wrong, but my impression is that the plan is to default > to gathering all possible stats types. So I'd probably write the > addendum that way rather than naming those two types specifically. Yes -- that plan has been hardcoded in ruleutils.c. I'll patch. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
