I noticed that gram.y has
NumericOnly:
FCONST { $$ = makeFloat($1); }
| '-' FCONST
{
$$ = makeFloat($2);
doNegateFloat($$);
}
| SignedIconst { $$ = makeInteger($1); }
;
but
SignedIconst: Iconst { $$ = $1; }
| '+' Iconst { $$ = + $2; }
| '-' Iconst { $$ = - $2; }
;
The inconsistency here means that you can do, for example,
regression=# set random_page_cost = +4;
SET
regression=# set random_page_cost = 4.2;
SET
but not
regression=# set random_page_cost = +4.2;
ERROR: syntax error at or near "4.2"
LINE 1: set random_page_cost = +4.2;
^
That's weird enough in itself, and the problem is about to get more
widespread because the partbound_datum production depends on NumericOnly.
Any objections to allowing "+ FCONST" here? I'm inclined to
fix this and back-patch it as well.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
