On 2017-05-31 15:06:06 -0700, Mark Dilger wrote:
> That's cold comfort, given that most users will be looking at the pg_class
> table and not writing C code that compares Node objects.  I wrote a bit of
> regression test logic that checks, and sure enough the relpartbound field
> shows up as unequal:
>                                                                               
>                                       relpartbound                            
>                     --------------------------------------------
> SELECT a.relpartbound, b.relpartbound, a.relpartbound = b.relpartbound, 
> a.relpartbound::text = b.relpartbound::text
>     FROM pg_class a, pg_class b
>     WHERE a.relname = 'acct_partitioned_1'
>       AND b.relname = 'acct_partitioned_2';
>                                                                               
>                                       relpartbound                            
>                                                                               
>           |                                                                   
>                                                  relpartbound                 
>                                                                               
>                      | ?column? | ?column?
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------+----------
>  {PARTITIONBOUNDSPEC :strategy l :listdatums ({CONST :consttype 23000 
> :consttypmod -1 :constcollid 0 :constlen 2 :constbyval true :constisnull 
> false :location -1 :constvalue 2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ]}) :lowerdatums <> 
> :upperdatums <> :location 82} | {PARTITIONBOUNDSPEC :strategy l :listdatums 
> ({CONST :consttype 23000 :consttypmod -1 :constcollid 0 :constlen 2 
> :constbyval true :constisnull false :location -1 :constvalue 2 [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 
> 0 0 ]}) :lowerdatums <> :upperdatums <> :location 73} | f        | f      
> (1 row)

Normal users aren't going to make sense of node trees in the first
place.  You should use pg_get_expr for it:
postgres[3008][1]=# SELECT pg_get_expr(relpartbound, oid) FROM pg_class WHERE 
relpartbound IS NOT NULL;
┌──────────────────────┐
│     pg_get_expr      │
├──────────────────────┤
│ FOR VALUES IN (1, 2) │
└──────────────────────┘
(1 row)

- Andres


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to