On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Why should ICU be any different than the system provider in this
> respect?  In both cases, we have a two-level comparison: first we use
> the collation-aware comparison, and then as a tie breaker, we use a
> binary comparison.  If we didn't do a binary comparison as a
> tie-breaker, wouldn't the result be logically incompatible with the =
> operator, which does a binary comparison?

I agree with that assessment.

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to