On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Why should ICU be any different than the system provider in this > respect? In both cases, we have a two-level comparison: first we use > the collation-aware comparison, and then as a tie breaker, we use a > binary comparison. If we didn't do a binary comparison as a > tie-breaker, wouldn't the result be logically incompatible with the = > operator, which does a binary comparison?
I agree with that assessment. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
