On 6/2/17 14:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 5/24/17 15:14, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> All the locking works just fine the way it is in master. The issue with
>> deadlock with apply comes from the wrong handling of the SIGTERM in the
>> apply (we didn't set InterruptPending). I changed the SIGTERM handler in
>> patch 0001 just to die which is actually the correct behavior for apply
>> workers. I also moved the connection cleanup code to the
>> before_shmem_exit callback (similar to walreceiver) and now that part
>> works correctly.
> I have committed this, in two separate parts.  This should fix the
> originally reported issue.
> I will continue to work through your other patches.  I notice there is
> still a bit of discussion about another patch, so please let me know if
> there is anything else I should be looking for.

I have committed the remaining two patches.  I believe this fixes the
originally reported issue.

Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to