On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 02:30:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > I didn't want to optimize for it --- I wanted a way to detect when DROP > > EXTENSION has no hope of working, and give more details. I assume the > > problem with that is the the object names are inside SQL scripts that > > cannot be easily interrogated. Are the pg_proc entries tied to the > > extension in some verifiable way that we could identify orphaned pg_proc > > lines? > > You could look for 'e'-type pg_depend entries.
OK, I will run some tests later and report back. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
