Hello, On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Rafia Sabih <rafia.sa...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I think if you have found spelling mistakes unrelated to this patch, >>> then it is better to submit those as a separate patch in a new thread. >> >> +1. > > Sure, attached is the version without those changes. >
Thank you for your comments. I have applied most of the changes. The regression comment change from 'fail' -> ' Following statement should fail' and 'ok' -> 'Following should complete successfully' is ignored since other tests in the file had similar comments The new patch is rebased over default_partition_v18.patch [http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org/msg315831.html] -- Beena Emerson EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
default_range_partition_v3.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
