On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Rafia Sabih
<rafia.sa...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I think if you have found spelling mistakes unrelated to this patch,
>>> then it is better to submit those as a separate patch in a new thread.
>> +1.
> Sure, attached is the version without those changes.

Thank you for your comments. I have applied most of the changes. The
regression comment change from 'fail' -> ' Following statement should
fail' and 'ok' -> 'Following should complete successfully' is ignored
since other tests in the file had similar comments

The new patch is rebased over default_partition_v18.patch


Beena Emerson

EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment: default_range_partition_v3.patch
Description: Binary data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to