Andrew Dunstan <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> The whole thing is explained here:
> <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20327.1322435...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> And since then the buildfarm has acquired a separate optional module
> that tests pg_upgrade. It's enabled by default in the sample config file.
> So it's not like we don't have buildfarm coverage - we do in fact.
> Re-enabling this in the Makefile would a) result in breakage on some
> members and b) make most members do redundant work.
> I vote for improving the docs.
WFM, I'll go do that (and maybe improve the comment in the makefile)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
