On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 03:21:34PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/3/17 01:04, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:15:50PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> On 5/30/17 13:25, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> >>> I think this cause is that the relation status entry could be deleted
> >>> by ALTER SUBSCRIPTION REFRESH before corresponding table sync worker
> >>> starting. Attached patch fixes issues reported on this thread so far.
> >>
> >> This looks like a reasonable change, but it conflicts with the change
> >> discussed on "logical replication - still unstable after all these
> >> months".  I think I'll deal with that one first.
> > 
> > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  You own
> > this open item.  Please observe the policy on open item ownership and send a
> > status update within three calendar days of this message.  Include a date 
> > for
> > your subsequent status update.
> I'm working on this now and will report back tomorrow.

IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED.  This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for
your status update.  Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open item
ownership[1] and then reply immediately.  If I do not hear from you by
2017-06-10 07:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team
ownership without further notice.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to