Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2017-06-12 17:10:28 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Cases where relacl became too large have been known to exist. I'm not >> sure whether relpartbound can really be that large to change the >> scenario significantly.
> Because it's further increasing the size by something unbounded in size, > which'll not uncommonly be large? It makes a fair amount of sense to > partition by multiple columns at once (using the expression syntax). How about gathering some actual evidence on the point --- ie, how big a partition expression do you need to make it fall over? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers