Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 6/15/17 15:57, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Pushed, thanks. I grabbed the very latest copy of ax_prog_perl_modules
>> out of the GNU archives --- it's only cosmetically different, but we
>> might as well be au courant.
> Um, this patch was previously rejected. Shouldn't we at least discuss
> it, or have it go through the commit fest? This is not a regression
> against 9.6.
It was rejected only because we didn't want to move the goalposts for
the then-active CMake effort. That argument no longer applies, I'd say.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
