On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 04:44:46PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Yes, that is _exactly_ the right place to look. Only in PG 10 do we > restart the new cluster to invalidate hash indexes. In previous > releases we didn't do the restart. > > That didn't matter with the old rsync instructions, but now that we have > removed the start/stop before rsync step, the final WAL status of > pg_upgrade matters. > > I suggest applying the attached patch
Sorry, I meant to say, I suggest applying the attached patch to all Postgres versions, of course modified. While the rsync instructions only appear in PG 9.5+, the instructions work for any supported version of Postgres, so we should allow it to continue working, even if the updated instructions are used. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
