Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coe...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coe...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Why not?  I mean, if there's code there to force the output into
>>>> binary mode, does that not work for the -Fc case?  And if it does work
>>>> for the -Fc case, then why doesn't it also work for -Z9?

>>> I have re-verified the patch with the help of my colleague 'Neha
>>> Sharma' on Windows server 2008 R2 machine and the fix looks to be
>>> working fine. With the help of attached patch,

>> Did you intended to attach the patch to this e-mail or are you
>> referring to Kuntal's patch up thread?  If later, then it is better to
>> mention the link of mail which has a patch that you have verified.

> I am referring to Kuntal's patch upthread.  The link for the email
> having the patch is,
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGz5QCJPvbBjXAmJuGx1B_41yVCetAJhp7rtaDf7XQGWuB1GSw%40mail.gmail.com

That patch looks reasonable to me, will push.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to