Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coe...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coe...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Why not? I mean, if there's code there to force the output into >>>> binary mode, does that not work for the -Fc case? And if it does work >>>> for the -Fc case, then why doesn't it also work for -Z9?
>>> I have re-verified the patch with the help of my colleague 'Neha >>> Sharma' on Windows server 2008 R2 machine and the fix looks to be >>> working fine. With the help of attached patch, >> Did you intended to attach the patch to this e-mail or are you >> referring to Kuntal's patch up thread? If later, then it is better to >> mention the link of mail which has a patch that you have verified. > I am referring to Kuntal's patch upthread. The link for the email > having the patch is, > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGz5QCJPvbBjXAmJuGx1B_41yVCetAJhp7rtaDf7XQGWuB1GSw%40mail.gmail.com That patch looks reasonable to me, will push. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers