On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 2:34 PM, David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Chapman Flack <c...@anastigmatix.net> wrote: >> I get the reported result (DELETE 0 and a table containing 2 and 3) >> in both 'read committed' and 'read uncommitted'. > > Practically speaking those are a single transaction isolation mode. > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/transaction-iso.html > > I think Merlin has mis-read the article he linked to. The example > being used there never claims to be done under serialization and seems > to describe an example of the perils of relying on the default > isolation level.
oops -- could be operator error :-) merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
