On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 21 June 2017 at 16:15, Yugo Nagata <nag...@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 19:08:35 +0530
>> Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Yugo Nagata <nag...@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Attached is a patch for the documentation fix.
>>> >
>>> Please attach the patch as well. :-)
>> I'm sorry, I forgot it. I attahed this.
> Thanks, will apply.

The patch is adjusting documentation for the observed behaviour. But I
don't see a justification as to why the observed behaviour is correct
one? Was there a commit which allowed startup process to be part of
pg_stat_activity but forgot to update the documentation or the current
behaviour is unintentional and probably needs to be fixed?

Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to