Shridhar Daithankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, consider this. Keep in mind that all of them are directories..
I can see no reason that we'd want a level of directory associated with
schemas...
> Well, with above proposal, drop database should be as simple. It's just that
> it would be more than one `rm -rf`rather than just one.
Right, there would be potentially one per tablespace. The key point
here is that the tablespace definitions are known cluster-wide, so a
"DROP DATABASE x" command running in database y would still be able
to figure out which subdirectories it needs to zap.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
