On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Anastasia Lubennikova > <lubennikov...@gmail.com> wrote: >> You claim that SLRUs now support five digit segment name, while in slru.h >> at current master I see the following: >> >> * Note: slru.c currently assumes that segment file names will be four hex >> * digits. This sets a lower bound on the segment size (64K transactions >> * for 32-bit TransactionIds). >> */
I've now complained about that comment in a separate thread. > It's not urgent, it's just cleanup work, so I've now moved it to the > next commitfest. I will try to figure out a new way to demonstrate > that it works correctly without having to ask a review[er] to disable > any assertions. Thanks again. Here's a rebased batch. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
ssi-slru-wraparound-v2.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
